- http://mathforum.org/kb/message.jspa?messageID=1638121
- http://www.abc.chemistry.bsu.by/vi/analyser/fitting.html
The tricks are:
- You're trying to fit a curve to the points plotted on the Real/Imaginary plane (like in the second graph below).
- Handle the data and parameters as real & imaginary, not magnitude & phase. Even if that isn't the most "natural" way to interpret your data for your problem/field.
- Split each complex parameter into two. One for the real and one for the imaginary part. If your parameters are real only, nothing needs to be done here.
- Similarly, split the complex data into two parts, doubling the number of data points you have. Doesn't matter if they are interleaved, or separate.
- The error function is calculated using one of the formulae from the second URL above.
- Due to the splitting of the complex data, the partial derivatives are done separately for the real and imaginary parts. If you are working on a real data point, use just the real part of the partial derivative. For the imaginary part, do the same.
Examples:
- Two parameters { 3+4i, 5+6i } become four real parameters, { 3, 4, 5, 6 }.
- Data points { 1+2i, 8+9i } become the new data series { 1, 2, 8, 9 } or { 1, 8, 2, 9 }.
- Example of raw and fitted data, fitting an equivalent circuit model to captured EIS (Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy) data:
